Much ado about Disney
MacRanger writes about the frenzy over ABC/Disney's Path to 9/11:
Think about it folks, ABC wouldn'?t have spent $40 million dollars and two years of production if they hadn'?t already vetted the facts they will portray. Regardless of the hysteria, they are on pretty good ground. In fact, the witnesses are all too willing to come forward if needed to give their accounts in person if needed.In 2004, while people on the right complained about the bias and outright lies of Fahrenheit 9/11, the movie went on. Today, Senate Democrats threaten Disney with legislative and legal sanctions.
Let's remember that the 9/11 Commission report didn't report all the facts and in some cases - like Able Danger - ignored facts. The writers and directors pulled a lot of storyline not from editorial license, but from eye witness accounts. THATS why you see such a push back. They know the real Clinton legacy is about to go in the crapper and while the Democratic Party has pretty much disavowed the Clinton's, the fact is that they are the last Democrats that were in power during the terrorism filled 90s, and proved that they cannot be trusted with National Security.
Sounds to me like the movie is far more truth rather than fiction.
Sphere: Related Content
♦DiggIt! ♦Add to del.icio.us ♦Add to Technorati Faves ♦ Facebook
|