I find myself compelled to make some comments regarding another's blog entry. For very practical reasons, the COMMENT feature on this person's blog was disabled, because rabble-rousers aren't limited to a single party affiliation.
Readers of this humble blog will know I have often debated Kathleen at ~unsettled~, because I find her positions reasoned and delivered in a mature manner even if those positions, more often than not, are diametrically opposed to mine (again, those who don't debate in this manner are not limited by party either).
Today she posted her dismay (dare I say disgust?) over the re-election of President Bush. I don't wish to take glee over her disappointment for I truly believe she wouldn't gloat had the votes gone the other direction.
I will, however, take exception to a few things she said, and to a few posts she presumably agrees with since she reposted them.
From her own postings :
>While I don't get how a middle-class parent and a civil servant, can be happy about, nay, have voted for, four more years of this, I didn't let myself get bated... even when said sibling called me a "liberal elitist". I don't think being educated on the issues and smart about our future makes me elitist, but if it does, than it's a badge I wear with pride. <
I may not be what some would call a 'civil servant' but I am employed by a defense contractor. Recently I was laid off due to, largely, budget shortfalls. I am a middle class parent, and I am the sole support for my family. I am educated, I read considerably about the issues, and I want nothing but the best for my children, their future, and the future of a nation as whole. I am Republican by party affiliation, because the Conservative party has yet to be established in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
I would not call Kathleen an elitist, but perhaps in time we can each learn what the other sees so desirable in the opposing party.
>And, though I know you don't do domestic campaigns anymore James , please, please reconsider.<
Considering I received DNC related e-mails from Mr. Carville (at least so said the header, with the return address of issues@dscc.org) with the subject line 'Throw the bums out' I doubt severely if he will ever stray far from domestic campaigns.
Comments on Kathleen's reposts of others (note: I can extrapolate she may agree with these posts in principle, but I wish to state she merely reposted them, and has not specifically endorsed them):
>One wonders how this happens. One wonders how people drive past their out-of-work neighbors and believes this to be an election about terrorism, of all things. Posted by Grimace at http://grimace.blog-city.com/read/892807.htm <
Clearly, it is about terrorism. Too many people have been misguided to think Iraq is about revenge or other scheme, and not part in parcel of the bigger picture. A democratic foothold will lead to a safer world. Had the WMD data from the CIA, UK Intel, Russian Intel been placed on your desk, would you have done anything different? Besides, Sen. Kerry saw the same data and voted for the authorization, so he cannot be held to no blame.
As for out-of-work neighbors, time and time again the stats don't reflect this. Growth in the economy: 3.7% Home ownsership is at an all-time high, Unemployment at record low levels. Yes, people are out of work, but no more so than any time in our recent history (the depression a notable exception). I don't buy the argument that some people 'stopped looking for work'; if they have, they are lazy. Even a piss-poor job (say: fast-food work for an out of work mill worker) is better than NO work. I did a menial job: it sucked, but I never stopped looking. It can be done.
>Okay so there is no reason to go into what is going on with the presidential race. My only thought at this point is that if Bush wins hopefully he will get the message that half of America does not like what he has been doing. If this election outcome proves to be his win, let it also serve as a report card for him - a progress report from the people if you will. - Go Go Boy Diary
{Kathleen's} Note: I doubt the aforementioned message will be received.<
That about 50% of the nation disapproves of the President is not exactly news. Think about it: a difference of some 538 votes would have had Vice President Gore elected 4 years ago; would the message of half the nation disapproving gotten through to him?
Evidence suggests Mr. Gore wouldn't have gotten the message: President Clinton never had 50% of the nation behind him in either of his two elections, yet he never seemed to let it get to him. He often uttered the phrase ‘a mandate from the people’, yet this supposed mandate never came from a majority.
Regardless, since when is it encumbered on the winner to see things the way the loser sees things? Clearly, more American's agree with the President, so maybe the minority of voters ought to consider what they others see. Tell me honestly: if this were 1992, would you tell the newly elected President Clinton to see things the way President George H. Bush does? Somehow I doubt it.
>* Pray that no one that I know and love needs a treatment for a degenerative disease that could be cured using stem cell research.
* Find a job that can't be outsourced to another country - Counting Sheep <
I take strong exception to the first comment: no disease has yet been helped directly/indirectly by embryonic stem cell research (as opposed to umbilical cord or adult stem cell research). President Bush signed into law funding for stem cell research; although he placed a cap on it, it isn't illegal. If you are so concerned with embryonic stem cell research, raise money on your own to aid in that investigation. Think of the Jerry Lewis Telethon: No one tells MDA how/when/where they spend their money. Stop placing the blame on the President; it is simply myopic.
And as a matter of I do have some one I love who is affected by spinal chord and nerve damage; this doesn't give me any more Carte Blanc to an opinion than any one else, but I am directly involved, so please hold your preaching; I am well aware of what is possible, what is feasible, and what is still in the realm of fantasy.
All this time I've been told the President is some how personally responsible for outsourcing jobs. The tax breaks that encourage this have been on the books before President Bush took office; exactly what bills has Sen. Kerry sponsored to curb these breaks?
>I mean, the religious-right is growing stronger by the day (as evidenced by yesterday's election) and their Christian-based, holier-than-thou mentality is using fear and damnation to coerce people into thinking the world will end if people don't follow their beliefs. This church/state combination is just too similar to what's going on in the middle-east for me. It's turning people away from each other and more strongly dividing this country into "us" (the northeast and coasts) versus "them" (south and heartland). And now I fear I'm guilty of being of that mentality. - Adventures in Gastronomy
<
To assume that only the so-called Religious Right is responsible for the re-election is to ignore the entire demographics of those who voted for him. So, yes, you are guilty of the mentality you accuse the country of being enveloped in.
Here's another opinion: perhaps the DNC has tooled it's message to the wrong people. They've already won over the big cities, but clearly their message is lost in middle America. Is it the people's fault there message is lost? Sen. Zell Miller has put forth a statistic that states Southern states had 20 Democratic Senate seats in 1984. Today, it is the Republican's that hold those 20 seats. Why is it so hard to accept that one party is addressing the needs of the people in those areas?
My view:
What do I think was the root cause of the DNC collapse? HATE. Not hate towards Democrats (at least not in a large part; there are those extreme partisans). It was the unabated hate towards President Bush. The seemingly non-stop BUSH=HITLER signs, the lies about the National Guard issue (thank you Dan Rather), the consistent repetition by Sen. Kerry of the lies regarding the alleged missing ammo in Iraq, the lies about the draft, the lies about the President's alleged lies about Iraq, the lies about the RNG plans to block minority voting. People get tired of lies, especially when all you have to say in your favor is 'I have a plan.' With a 20 year record of little accomplishment, you need to show the people something more than the phrase "I have a plan."
Every tax payer got a tax cut; that is a result that can seen, touched and felt: THAT'S what wins a election, with a majority.
Unless the likes of Sens. Lieberman and Miller can influence the Democratic Party, I predict the Republican Majority will hold firm for the near future. Simply saying "Anyone but HIM" didn't work for Sen. Bob Dole in 1996, and with two complete Presidential election cycles in the can (not to mention the interim elections), it's obvious it isn't working for the DNC.
Sphere: Related Content
♦
DiggIt! ♦
Add to del.icio.us ♦
Add to Technorati Faves ♦
Facebook